Re: Order by optimisations?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Order by optimisations? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7590.1121403584@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Order by optimisations? (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Order by optimisations?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: > OK, so what's going on here? > usa=> explain select * from users_myfoods_map where user_id=1 and > date='2003-11-03' order by date; > QUERY PLAN > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Sort (cost=4.84..4.85 rows=2 width=22) > Sort Key: date > -> Index Scan using users_myfoods_map_user_id_date_key on > users_myfoods_map (cost=0.00..4.83 rows=2 width=22) > Index Cond: ((user_id = 1) AND (date = '2003-11-03'::date)) > (4 rows) Well, date evidently isn't the high-order key of this index. But why exactly are you worried about a sort of 2 rows? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: