Re: PostgreSQL 9.0
От | Dawid Kuroczko |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 758d5e7f0701301327q6eee5681kd8b78ba0718a84d7@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL 9.0
Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 1/30/07, Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com> wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: > >> Who would they target anyways? > >> There's no one company.... > > > > They could buy out CommandPrompt and EnterpriseDB... > > > > The buyouts wouldn't *kill* pg, but they would wound it mightily. > > I don't think so. High-profile and high priced buyouts > of CommandPrompt and EnterpriseDB would be great for > postgresql. > > It would be a strong motivation for entrepreneurs to start > postgresql companies, developers to build postgresql expertise, > VCs to invest in postgresql companies. And guys like Pervasive > would be kicking themselves for not keeping sticking with it. One would think that with the acquisiton of Berkeley DB and InnoDB one should see a flourish of database engine startups, but I seem to have missed that. My point is, its not about throwing money at a problem. PostgreSQL seems to be having right people at the right place and benefits from it. They do the hard work, they do it well, hence 8.0, 8.1, 8.2 and upcoming 8.3 release. If you buy these people out, it will take time to find and teach new ones. Writing RDBMS is not dusting crops, ya know. ;))) Regards, Dawid PS: I guess this thread belongs in advocacy, please update To: headers accordingly.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: