comp.databases.postgresql poll?
От | Dawid Kuroczko |
---|---|
Тема | comp.databases.postgresql poll? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 758d5e7f041108161734f7cbfb@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
I've been thinking... with all the hussle regarding Usenet and PostgreSQL mailing lists... I think it would be useful to make a poll about what the readers of mailing lists think about it. If you agree (I don't feel too rebelious at the moment ;)) I could create a simple call for opinion and send it to mailing-lists (I think it should go to all). The replies should be directed to me, and after 7 days time I would present here summary. I think it would clarify things a bit. Readers would need to select one of these sentences. My opinion is YES, pgsql-* mailing-lists should be gated to Big8 hierarchy, in bidirectional UNMODERATED way. My opinion is YES, pgsql-* should be gated to Big8 MODERATED way, featuring white lists, etc. My opinion is NO, pgsql-* should be separated from Big8, but at the same time I feel the Big8 comp.databases.postgresql.* hierarchy should be created nonetheless. My opinion is NO, pgsql-* should be separated from Big8. I don't want abything having to do with Big8. Mu opinion is... I ABSTAIN. I'm happy with whatever you do. The post would of course contain description of what Big8 is, why all the hassle, and whats with the moderation. I would of course send such message here, prior to starting the poll, so you we would be able to figure out ambiguities. Of course it would be only informative -- to check what are the feelings about it throughout pgsql-* mailing lists. And the results would be preseneted in Usenet style -- with all taking part in the poll listed, so people could see not only how many are for/against it, but also who. Regards, Dawid
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: