Re: Reindex "locked" standby database
От | Mladen Gogala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reindex "locked" standby database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 75898e59-aa59-0293-1398-b9d1bcf70a3b@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reindex "locked" standby database (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reindex "locked" standby database
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 12/14/21 22:37, Michael Paquier wrote: > You are referring to the startup process that replays WAL, right? > Without having an idea about the type of workload your primary and/or > standbys are facing, as well as an idea of the configuration you are > using on both (hot_standby_feedback for one), I have no direct idea, > but that could be a conflict caused by a concurrent vacuum. Hi Michael, I am preparing for a standby deployment. I don't have a standby yet and, therefore, I don't have any standby problems. Would it be advisable to turn vacuum off on the standby? Applying WAL will also, in theory, populate the statistics which is also held in the database blocks. Regards -- Mladen Gogala Database Consultant Tel: (347) 321-1217 https://dbwhisperer.wordpress.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: