Re: makeAndExpr(), etc. confined to gram.y?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: makeAndExpr(), etc. confined to gram.y? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 75753.1403711210@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: makeAndExpr(), etc. confined to gram.y? (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: makeAndExpr(), etc. confined to gram.y?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes: >>> Is there a reason why they've been left out of >>> makefuncs.h/makefuncs.c? Perhaps they are not supposed to be used >>> outside gram.y at all? For example, previously a caller (potentially) >>> outside parser could do a makeA_Expr(AEXPR_AND, ...). I guess this is >>> no longer possible with AEXPR_AND gone? >> What would be the purpose? There is noplace except gram.y that builds >> raw parse trees. > Yeah, that is true. Sorry, I am unaware as to how generic make* > functions in gram.y are and how they differ from those in makefuncs.c. > So, use of make* family of functions outside parser is their abuse in > some way? Anything that needs to use these functions should somehow be > accomplished in parser perhaps. For example, duplicate/redundant CHECK > expressions elimination and such? Well, the larger point here is that those functions are specific to gram.y's problem of constructing multi-AND(OR) structures during a series of binary production actions. I don't see that there's any use for them elsewhere, and the way that they modify the input structures wouldn't necessarily be safe anywhere else either. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: