Re: CIC and deadlocks
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CIC and deadlocks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7574.1175367640@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CIC and deadlocks ("Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CIC and deadlocks
Re: CIC and deadlocks |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> writes: > Yes, it may work. Do we need to take some extra care because > proc-xmin is set while holding SHARED lock on proc array ? Good point. I'm envisioning a procarray.c function along the lines of bool TransactionHasSnapshot(xid) which returns true if the xid is currently listed in PGPROC and has a nonzero xmin. CIC's cleanup wait loop would check this and ignore the xid if it returns false. Your point means that this function would have to take exclusive not shared lock while scanning the procarray, which is kind of annoying, but it seems not fatal since CIC isn't done all that frequently. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: