Re: Why Not MySQL?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why Not MySQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7573.957366741@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why Not MySQL? (Malcontent null <malcontent@msgto.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Malcontent null <malcontent@msgto.com> writes: > "In a nutshell I want to use postgres as a back end to an access > database. This means that all collation done by postgres musht be case > insensitive including like clauses." Well, it'd certainly be easy enough to make a case-insensitive set of text comparison functions and LIKE comparator (sounds like you already found out where they live, so go to it). The $64 question is exactly when where and how to invoke them. For your immediate purpose I suppose you can just alter the standard operators, and thus produce a server that can do nothing *but* case-insensitive text comparisons. That will certainly not be acceptable as a general-usage answer, however. There has been a good deal of talk about supporting more of SQL92's national-character and collation features in future releases. What might ultimately happen is that we offer a case-insensitive collation mode that could be assigned to particular text columns, or even made the default for a whole database. Not sure how far down the road that is. In the meantime, there's no shame in running a locally-hacked server. That's one of the things that open source is for, after all ;-) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: