Re: monetary data type
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: monetary data type |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7526.986596275@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | monetary data type (Phuong Ma <pma@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Phuong Ma <pma@commandprompt.com> writes: > I read this from the 7.1 documentation: > 3.2. Monetary Type > The money type may become a locale-aware > layer over the numeric type in a future release. > The money type stores U.S.-style currency with fixed decimal point > representation. If Postgres is compiled with locale support then the > money type uses locale-specific output formatting. > ---------- > Why does this first say that the money type may become locale-aware in a > FUTURE release, then the next paragraph says that the money type USES > locale specific output formatting. So which one is it? In that sentence, "locale-aware" is an adjective modifying "layer". It does not say that the current implementation is not locale-aware; it says that it's not based on numeric. > Why would it > be better to use numeric or decimal rather than money data type? Overflow. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: