Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 751261b21002031037r45009ad5n54e5a32e61da05e6@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 13:20, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com> wrote: >> Perl (DBD::Pg anyway) has been compatible since May 2008. > > I would interpret that to mean that there is a significant possibility > that a too-old DBD::Pg could get used with a new PostgreSQL, and > therefore we shouldn't change anything for 9.0. May 2008 is not that > long ago, especially for people running systems like RHEL with > five-year major release cycles. I fall into this camp with a few machines still running standard RHEL 4 which I believe has DBD::Pg 1.32 installed. We do keep up to date with PostgreSQL but the machines connecting to it include everything from brand new web servers through to ancient machines in accounting running reports. As much as I would like GUCs to disappear I think this one should proceed cautiously and probably be a 9.1 or even 9.2 item.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: