Re: BUG #16615: Cannot determine type of Date for "is null" expression
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16615: Cannot determine type of Date for "is null" expression |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 749016.1600008172@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #16615: Cannot determine type of Date for "is null" expression (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16615: Cannot determine type of Date for "is null" expression
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > 1. Postgres JDBC driver will always use Oid UNSPECIFIED(0) for Date type. > See PgPreparedStatement.java, in setDate function. You could ask the JDBC crew why they do that, although I suspect they have reasons. > 2. In Postgres server, it won't coerce the type to Date even if we provide > the type. See parse_expr.c in transformExprRecurse function. There's nothing to coerce it *to*. I'd suggest working around this with something like select * from tb_user where (?::date is null or createdat > ?) Although TBH that query looks pretty fishy to start with. Do you really want the entire table when the argument is null? Is it even possible for the argument to be null --- I doubt Java has such a thing as a null Date? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: