Re: Simple Join
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Simple Join |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7484.1134600423@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Simple Join (Kevin Brown <blargity@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Simple Join
Re: Simple Join Re: Simple Join |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Kevin Brown <blargity@gmail.com> writes: > I'm running 8.1 installed from source on a Debian Sarge server. I have a > simple query that I believe I've placed the indexes correctly for, and I > still end up with a seq scan. It makes sense, kinda, but it should be able > to use the index to gather the right values. I continue to marvel at how many people think that if it's not using an index it must ipso facto be a bad plan ... That plan looks perfectly fine to me. You could try forcing some other choices by fooling with the planner enable switches (eg set enable_seqscan = off) but I doubt you'll find much improvement. There are too many rows being pulled from ordered_products to make an index nestloop a good idea. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: