Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes:
> Enlighten me:
> Why use #include "header.h" over #include <header.h> for exported interface
> header files?
As Marc mentioned, we've gone round on that before. I think the bias
for using "" is largely because it's convenient (or even necessary,
in some scenarios) for building Postgres itself. I am not aware of
any compelling arguments why <> would be better from the perspective
of a client app trying to use already-installed Postgres header files
--- if you know some reasons, let's hear 'em!
I'm prepared to believe that the client's-eye view might favor something
different from the developer's-eye view. I think you were suggesting
that we might want to replace "" by <> in installed copies of the
headers. I'd support that if it were shown necessary, but I'd want to
be shown first...
regards, tom lane