Contacting Tom Lane :)

Hi,

Tom answered a question from me and when I attemped to reply
I got the following stuff...

(I am running MacOSX with a postfix (output server). Most of
the time after I get a complaint about non delivery I tell
postfix to use my providers (Adelphia ) mail agent. This does
not work for Mr Lanes mailbox ( Note I set my return address
to my Incoming mailbox at the University).

Is Tom's mail address output only?

Jerry


Begin forwarded message:

> From: "System Administrator" <postmaster@EKU.EDU>
> Date: December 17, 2004 6:10:57 PM EST
> To: "Levan, Jerry" <Jerry.Levan@EKU.EDU>
> Subject: Undeliverable:Re: [GENERAL] OSX 10.3.7 broke Postgresql
> 8.0.0b5?
>
> Your message
>
>   To:      Tom Lane
>   Cc:      Postgres General
>   Subject: Re: [GENERAL] OSX 10.3.7 broke Postgresql 8.0.0b5?
>   Sent:    Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:10:55 -0500
>
> did not reach the following recipient(s):
>
> tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us on Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:11:03 -0500
>     The e-mail account does not exist at the organization this message
> was sent to.  Check the e-mail address, or contact the recipient
> directly to find out the correct address.
>     < mta13.adelphia.net #5.1.1 smtp; 550 5.0.0 Go away till you've
> fixed your virus problem>
> Reporting-MTA: dns; FACSTAFF.facultystaff.eku.edu
>
> Final-Recipient: RFC822; tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.1.1
> X-Supplementary-Info: < mta13.adelphia.net #5.1.1 smtp; 550 5.0.0 Go
> away till you've fixed your virus problem>
> X-Display-Name: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> From: "Levan, Jerry" <Jerry.Levan@EKU.EDU>
> Date: December 17, 2004 6:10:55 PM EST
> To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Cc: "Postgres General" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] OSX 10.3.7 broke Postgresql 8.0.0b5?
>
>
> Well, what might be some good settings for a smallish db with
>  the default configuration?
>
>  Jerry
>
>  On Dec 17, 2004, at 5:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>  > Jerry LeVan <jerry.levan@eku.edu> writes:
>  >> Ok, I got postgres to start...
>  >> I used these settings.
>  >
>  > FWIW, I just updated to 10.3.7 from 10.3.6 and compared the
> kern.sysv.*
>  > sysctl settings before and after.  I see no indication that the
> default
>  > values have changed.
>  >
>  >                       regards, tom lane
>  >
>
>