Re: SV: Problem with pg_notify / listen
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SV: Problem with pg_notify / listen |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 744927.1606536220@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SV: Problem with pg_notify / listen (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes: > ... agreed. In general, recycling SLRU space entails three steps that shall > not overlap: > 1. Stop reading data in the space, regulated by some "logical tail". > 2. Unlink files wholly within the bounds of the space. > 3. Start writing data into the space, regulated by some "physical tail" (most > often called a "stop limit"). Check. > Commit d4031d7 fixed overlap of (2) and (3). For pg_notify, though, it > introduced overlap of (1) and (2). I've now checked the other SLRUs for > similar problems, but I found nothing urgent: Good, I was wondering if we had any similar issues elsewhere. > I think we don't yet have the right name here, seeing QUEUE_TAIL_PAGE != > QUEUE_POS_PAGE(QUEUE_TAIL) sounds paradoxical, yet happens regularly. How > about naming it QUEUE_STOP_PAGE? Hmm, it's not very clear what "stop" means here. What do you think of QUEUE_OLDEST_PAGE? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: