Re: configure in snapshout == configure.in
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: configure in snapshout == configure.in |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7448.977930971@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | configure in snapshout == configure.in (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: configure in snapshout == configure.in
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at> writes: > There is something busted in the snapshots, that leads to a wrong > configure file. The file is equal to configure.in (not autoconf'ed). > First noticed shortly before Christmas. Last week I tried to do a "make clean" in some subdirectory that's not cleaned by a toplevel clean -- I think it was doc/src/sgml, but it might have been a contrib dir -- and make went absolutely nuts. When the dust settled I had a toplevel configure file that was identical to configure.in, just like you describe, and I couldn't do anything because make kept trying to re-execute configure before it would do anything else. After I re-fetched a valid copy of configure, I couldn't replicate the behavior, so I thought maybe I'd mistyped. But if it's happening in the snapshot build too, then something is rotten in the makefiles. I've seen some other bizarre behavior from make lately, like failing to rebuild utils/SUBSYS.o when some of the utils subdirectories contained newer SUBSYS.o files. Again, hard to replicate, but I've seen it. I'm starting to wonder if our spiffy new makefiles are stressing any buggy areas of gmake... FWIW, I'm running GNU Make version 3.79.1, which is the latest release last I checked. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: