Re: amcheck/verify_heapam doesn't check for interrupts
От | Mark Dilger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: amcheck/verify_heapam doesn't check for interrupts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7433F43F-B8AE-494E-9C4F-7A024265EE36@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | amcheck/verify_heapam doesn't check for interrupts (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: amcheck/verify_heapam doesn't check for interrupts
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Aug 26, 2021, at 2:38 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > > It looks like we neglect to call CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() anywhere > inside verify_heapam.c. Is there any reason for this? Not any good one that I can see. > Can't we just > put a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() at the top of the outermost loop, inside > verify_heapam()? I expect we could. > Not sure if pg_amcheck itself is a factor here too -- didn't get that far. That runs an event loop in the client over multiple checks (heap and/or btree) running in backends, just as reindexdb andvacuumdb do over parallel reindexes and vacuums running in backends. It should be just as safe to ctrl-c out of pg_amcheckas out of those two. They all three use fe_utils/cancel.h's setup_cancel_handler(), so I would expect modifyingverify_heapam would be enough. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: