Re: A couple of patches for PostgreSQL 64bit support
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A couple of patches for PostgreSQL 64bit support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7404.1120744271@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | A couple of patches for PostgreSQL 64bit support (Koichi Suzuki <koichi@intellilink.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: A couple of patches for PostgreSQL 64bit support
Re: A couple of patches for PostgreSQL 64bit support Re: A couple of patches for PostgreSQL 64bit support |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Koichi Suzuki <koichi@intellilink.co.jp> writes: > Here're a couple of patches for PostgreSQL 64bit support. There're just > two extension to 64bit, size of shared memory and transaction ID. I asked originally for some experimental evidence showing any value in having more than 2Gb of shared buffers. In the absence of any convincing demonstration, I'm not very inclined to worry about whether we can handle wider-than-int shared memory size. As for the XID change, I don't think this patch accurately reflects the size of the impact. There are a lot of things that in practice need to be the same size as XID (CID, most obviously, but I suspect also OID). And again, some demonstration of the performance impact would be appropriate. Here, not only do you have to prove that widening XID isn't a big performance hit in itself, but you also have to convince us that it's a win compared to the existing approach of vacuuming at least every billion transactions. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: