Re: PostgreSQL-13.3 parser.y with positional references by named references
От | Domingo Alvarez Duarte |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL-13.3 parser.y with positional references by named references |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 73f49453-e775-82dc-4d94-65bd1b759b2e@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL-13.3 parser.y with positional references by named references (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL-13.3 parser.y with positional references by named references
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I understand the concerns but I would not qualify it as "minor developer-convenience feature". I'm not impartial because the initial suggestion was mine, just to add more options to be considered: What if the generated parser/lexer be present in the tarball distributions ? Cheers ! On 7/7/21 17:14, Tom Lane wrote: > ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?=) writes: >> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes: >>> On 04.07.21 17:58, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> When is "some time now"? >>> release 2.5 (2011-05-14) >> Do we support building on RHEL6? It only ships bison 2.4, so that would >> mean people building on that would have to install it seprately. > A quick look through the buildfarm shows these animals that would be > unhappy: > > sysname | snapshot | l gaur | 2021-07-03 22:56:25 |configure: using bison (GNU Bison) 1.875 > prairiedog | 2021-07-07 06:38:15 | configure: using bison (GNU Bison) 1.875 > locust | 2021-07-07 07:15:22 | configure: using bison (GNU Bison) 2.3 > longfin | 2021-07-07 04:39:09 | configure: using bison (GNU Bison) 2.3 > sifaka | 2021-07-07 04:33:58 | configure: using bison (GNU Bison) 2.3 > anole | 2021-07-01 15:50:38 | configure: using bison (GNU Bison) 2.4.1 > gharial | 2021-07-05 08:00:48 | configure: using bison (GNU Bison) 2.4.1 > walleye | 2021-07-07 06:55:35 | configure: using bison (GNU Bison) 2.4.2 > jacana | 2021-07-06 03:00:44 | Jul 05 23:00:49 configure: using bison (GNU Bison) 2.4.2 > > (hmm, almost half of those are mine :-(). The main thing I take away > from this is that Apple is still shipping 2.3, which means that requiring > 2.5 would completely break the ability to build on macOS without using > anything from homebrew or macports. That seems like moving the goalposts > pretty far for a minor developer-convenience feature. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: