Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumeratedatabases?
От | Chapman Flack |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumeratedatabases? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 73e2a806-08df-d4ad-c51f-f46f8d349f5f@anastigmatix.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumeratedatabases? (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumerate databases?
Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumerate databases? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/29/2017 05:48 PM, Chapman Flack wrote: > I'm thinking of writing a background worker that will enumerate > the databases present, and spin off, for each one, another BGW > that will establish a connection and do stuff. Can I even do this? "Unlike RegisterBackgroundWorker, which can only be called from within the postmaster, RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorker must be called from a regular backend." Can I call RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorker when not in the postmaster, but also not in a "regular backend", but rather another BGW? Put another way, can a BGW be regarded as a "regular backend" for the purpose of this rule? -Chap
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: