Re: dropping non-existent tables
| От | Walsh, Richard (Richard) |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: dropping non-existent tables |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 73E4F3992055E8429385A496BCCC90EC0F0F8774@bg0007avexu1.global.avaya.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | dropping non-existent tables ("Walsh, Richard (Richard)" <richardwalsh@avaya.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Thanks for this Mark. This seems like it will work well for TABLES and VIEWS. However I have also other categories such as USER, GROUP and TYPE. For these I cant seem to find out where they are in the information_schema in postgres. There is no CREATE GROUP statement in the SQL standard, so this is probably why it is not in the information_schema. The CREATE USER and CREATE TYPE statements are PostgreSQL extensions. So these may not be in the information_schema for this reason. Has anyone had to deal with this before. Thanks, Richie. -----Original Message----- From: mark reid [mailto:pgsql@markreid.org] Sent: 26 July 2005 18:23 To: Walsh, Richard (Richard) Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] dropping non-existent tables Hello, You can use the information_schema.* tables, which are part of the SQL standard (and thus not proprietary). -Mark. Walsh, Richard (Richard) wrote: > Hi, > I have a problem in that I need to drop non-existent tables in a DDL > script. This is in order that the script can re-build a database > schema if the tables already exist. However, in Postgres this is > proving to be a problem because if the table does not exist then the > DDL execution will stop once it gets an error. I know that I can > create a custom function that will check the relevant postGres table > to see if the table already exists, but I don't want to do this as I > would like to keep the DDL as non-proprietary as possible. Anyone any > ideas on a work-around for this problem that does not involve creating > a custom function. > thanks, > Richie.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: