Re: Optimization of vacuum for logical replication
От | Konstantin Knizhnik |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Optimization of vacuum for logical replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 73920efc-ea3e-a4fc-3c4e-bc1ba6f5789b@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Optimization of vacuum for logical replication (Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Optimization of vacuum for logical replication
Re: Optimization of vacuum for logical replication |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 21.08.2019 12:34, Bernd Helmle wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 21.08.2019, 12:20 +0300 schrieb Konstantin Knizhnik: >> I wonder if we can check that >> >> 1. wal_revel is "logical" >> 2. There are no physical replication slots >> 3. WAL archiving is disables > Not sure i get that correctly, i can still have a physical standby > without replication slots connected to such an instance. How would your > idea handle this situation? Yes, it is possible to have physical replica withotu replication slot. But it is not safe, because there is always a risk that lag between master and replica becomes larger than size of WAL kept at master. Also I can't believe that DBA which explicitly sets wal_level is set to logical will use streaming replication without associated replication slot. And certainly it is possible to add GUC which controls such optimization. -- Konstantin Knizhnik Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: