Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7388.1465494669@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Yes, let's fix it. This will also take care of the questions about >> whether the GIN/GIST opclass tweaks I made a few months ago require >> module version bumps. > Tom, there's a patch for this at > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/574F091A.3050800@proxel.se which > I think you should review, since you were the one who made the tweaks > involved. Any chance you can do that RSN? If we want to get this > done at all, we should really get it into beta2. Also, the patches > Andreas posted for applying parallel-safety markings apply on top of > that, so that needs to go in first, at least for the affected modules. OK, I'll take it. You're done with Andreas' patches otherwise? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: