Re: Inline non-SQL SRFs using SupportRequestSimplify

"=?ISO-8859-1?B?emVuZ21hbg==?=" <zengman@halodbtech.com> writes:
> I've noticed this interesting feature and would like to modify this test case to clarify that we fall back to the
originallogic when inlining fails.  
> This is a small change that doesn't touch core code. What do you all think?

I think this looks like a waste of test cycles.  AFAICS it won't add
even a single line of code coverage for inline_function_in_from().
Why do you think we need it?

            regards, tom lane