Re: Extremely slow DELETE with cascade foreign keys
От | Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Extremely slow DELETE with cascade foreign keys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 734f6343-35f6-1d1d-3fd7-87e1a1dea9da@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Extremely slow DELETE with cascade foreign keys (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Extremely slow DELETE with cascade foreign keys
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Em 05-12-2017 15:25, Tom Lane escreveu: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: >> Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote: >>> explain analyze delete from field_values where transaction_id=226; >>> QUERY PLAN >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Delete on field_values (cost=0.43..257.93 rows=481 width=6) (actual >>> time=367375.805..367375.805 rows=0 loops=1) >>> -> Index Scan using index_field_values_on_transaction_id on >>> field_values (cost=0.43..257.93 rows=481 width=6) (actual time=0.223..4.216 >>> rows=651 loops=1) >>> Index Cond: (transaction_id = 226) >>> Planning time: 0.234 ms >>> Execution time: 367375.882 ms >>> (5 registros) >>> >>> Time: 367377,085 ms (06:07,377) >> Normally this is because you lack indexes on the referencing columns, so >> the query that scans the table to find the referencing rows is a >> seqscan. > Actually though ... the weird thing about this is that I'd expect to > see a separate line in the EXPLAIN output for time spent in the FK > trigger. Where'd that go? > > regards, tom lane Yes, I was also hoping to get more insights through the EXPLAIN output :)
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: