Re: [BUGS] Problem with declarative partitioning and COPY FROM
От | Ragnar Ouchterlony |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] Problem with declarative partitioning and COPY FROM |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 732dfc84-25f5-413c-1eee-0bfa7a370093@agama.tv обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] Problem with declarative partitioning and COPY FROM (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] Problem with declarative partitioning and COPY FROM
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2017-01-11 13:24, Amit Langote wrote: > There's a bug and has been reported on the -hackers mailing list as > well. Please try your example after applying the patch 0002 attached > with the following email: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/01bc4745-bac8-a033-96a1-8a42b45d2fc1%40lab.ntt.co.jp Ok, that is good! I tested the patch as is, but it did not make a difference. Then I read the patch more carefully. + /* + * FIXME: We don't engage the bulk-insert mode for partitioned tables, + * because the the heap relation is most likely change from one row to + * next due to tuple-routing. + */ + if (cstate->rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE) + bistate = GetBulkInsertState(); The if-statement does not match how I read the comment. That is, shouldn't it be "!=" rather than "=="? I have tested using that change and now I get the results I expect. /Ragnar Ouchterlony, Agama Technologies -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: