Re: Missing OID rant
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Missing OID rant |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7322.1082648503@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Missing OID rant ("John Sidney-Woollett" <johnsw@wardbrook.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
"John Sidney-Woollett" <johnsw@wardbrook.com> writes: > Please can someone explain why Postgres cannot recognize that objects > (referenced by pl/pgsql functions) whose OID no longer exists could in > fact be found (as new objects) if the function was reparsed and compiled > again. Criticism in the form of a patch would be useful. > Whenever you delete an object, you locate any functions (or other objects) > referencing that object's OID, and you mark them as invalid, and any > subsequent objects that now refer to the newly invalidated object(s). Yup, this is on the TODO list, and has been for awhile: * Flush cached query plans when their underlying catalog data changes > I don't know, but cannot believe that it would be hard to implement this, Step right up ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: