Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0

On 2019-04-11 05:59, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 03:50:27PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> And here is the patch to address this issue.  It happens that a bit
>> more than the dependency switch was lacking here:
>> - At swap time, we need to have the new index definition track
>> relispartition from the old index.
>> - Again at swap time, the inheritance link needs to be updated between
>> the old/new index and its parent when reindexing a partition index.
> 
> Peter, this is an open item, and I think as the committer of the
> feature you are its owner.  Well, in this case, I don't mind taking
> the ownership as need be as I know this stuff.  Anyway, could you have
> a look at the patch proposed and see if you have any issues with it?

Looks good, committed.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services