Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 72D909B6-28B1-4E12-B358-C6F2C65E86C8@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11 (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Defaulting to jit=on/off for v11
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On September 15, 2018 8:26:17 AM MDT, Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > >On 09/14/2018 08:18 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> I'd go with #2, personally. It does seem that the costing needs >work, >>> but it's not clear to me that we know what to change, so it's kinda >>> late to propose #3 for v11. >> +1. I also favor option #2. >> > >+ about 0.8. I hope we do get some good field testing if it, though. Cool, sounds we have agreement. I'll try to come up with a patch. I'm [un]fortunately hiking till Wednesday, so I won'thave an easy time to push a patch. I probably could push something tomorrow, but I'd have a hard time cleaning upif needed. Does anybody feel we should have that in Mondays release? Andres Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: