Re: Crash in gist insertion on pathological box data
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Crash in gist insertion on pathological box data |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7290.1238981342@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Crash in gist insertion on pathological box data (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Crash in gist insertion on pathological box data
Re: Crash in gist insertion on pathological box data |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> writes: >> I don't like throwing an error there; I wish there were a way for the >> generic code to apply the fallbackSplit code instead. I see that >> in this particular formulation it's dependent on the datatype --- >> can we get around that, by having it invoke the union method? > Done. rtree.patch.gz contains patch for gistproc.c, genericsplit.patch.gz adds > simple genericPickSplit to gistsplit.c to workaround bug of user-defined picksplit. This looks good to me. I tested it to the extent of verifying that either patch individually would prevent the originally-reported failure. The only question I have is whether we want this nag message or not: ! ereport(LOG, ! (errcode(ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR), ! errmsg("Picksplit method for %d column of index \"%s\" failed", ! attno+1, RelationGetRelationName(r)), ! errhint("Index is not optimal, to optimize it contact developer or try to use the column as a second onein create index command"))); I'd be inclined to keep it but reduce it to level DEBUG1 or so. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: