Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7282.1123949484@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > SELECT pg_ls_dir > FROM ( > SELECT pg_ls_dir(t1.setting) > FROM (SELECT setting FROM pg_settings > WHERE NAME = 'log_directory') AS t1 > ) AS t2, > (SELECT setting FROM pg_settings > WHERE NAME = 'log_filename') AS t3 > WHERE t2.pg_ls_dir LIKE regexp_replace(t3.setting, '%.*', '') || > '%' || regexp_replace(t3.setting, '.*\\.', '.') ; This is unnecessarily complicated --- use current_setting, eg, select * from pg_ls_dir(current_setting('log_directory')) where pg_ls_dir like regexp_replace(current_setting('log_filename'), '%.', '%', 'g'); > I really don't like that pg_stat_file() to returns a record > rather than named columns. How do I even access the individual record > values? "select * from ...". See the documentation: Use it like this: SELECT * FROM pg_stat_file('filename') AS s(length int8, atime timestamptz, mtime timestamptz, ctime timestamptz, isdir bool); I suppose as long it's just this one function at stake, we could imagine fixing the pg_proc row after-the-fact (later in the initdb sequence). Pretty klugy but something nicer could get done in the 8.2 time frame. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: