Re: [pgsql-advocacy] First draft of Beta announcement
От | Gavin Flower |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] First draft of Beta announcement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 727b5c08-0aa6-c6cf-47d3-0b964642ea11@archidevsys.co.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] First draft of Beta announcement (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] First draft of Beta announcement
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 15/05/17 08:53, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2017-05-12 09:40:01 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: >> Josh, Justin, Andres, Gunnar, Peter: >> >> Replying in one long-ass email: >> >> On 05/11/2017 12:11 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> On 2017-05-11 12:08:04 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: >>>> This has been updated with fixes per Andres, Debra, and Petr. >>>> >>>> Please look and suggest any additional improvements. >>> There's not JIT compilation in v10 - I wish ;). I tried to point in the >>> right direction with the list of commits, and the relevant slide >>> numbers... > If we had that, I'd put it as a major feature ;) > > >> Can you suggest a different 1-line description? > It's like four relatively large patches (the last being 8868 > insertions(+), 6531 deletions(-)), so it's not necessarily easy to break > it down to a 1-line summary, without loosing meaning. Therefore I'd > suggest something general "Significantly improved performance for > analytics queries", unless we want to break those into multiple ones > ("faster hashtable for bitmapscan and aggregation", "faster aggregation > when multiple aggregates are used", "faster expression and filter > evaluation"), but that seems a bit excessive... > >> Because that's what I got from your slides. What are we actually >> doing differently? > That's why I'd pointed to specific slides and the commit hashes... Part > of that work is committed in v10, part is not. > > > - Andres > > I'd like the extra detail - a simple one line description seems to hand wavy! Cheers, Gavin
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: