Re: partitioning using dblink
От | Scara Maccai |
---|---|
Тема | Re: partitioning using dblink |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 726329.26654.qm@web28113.mail.ukl.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | partitioning using dblink (Scara Maccai <m_lists@yahoo.it>) |
Ответы |
Re: partitioning using dblink
Re: partitioning using dblink |
Список | pgsql-general |
> Exactly, because inheritance/constraint exclusion wont work with views. Ok, so there should be something written in the docs about it... From: "the information about a view in the PostgreSQL system catalogs is exactly the same as it is for a table. So for the parser, there is absolutely no difference between a table and a view" I got that there should be no difference... plus, I don't get any errors, it's only that data in the view doesn't show upwhen I query the master table. > > 2) Why am I supposed to use unions in the view? > > So that query evaluator can exclude unnecessary partitions. Ok: that would be another way of having partitions, right? > > 3) I know that I am doing select * from tbl in the remote db; that is > something I can work on later. > > At least I would like to see it working, since there is nothing in the docs > that says it shouldn't be working... > > 4) I am not able to rewrite my queries. > > Have fun then. Yeah I know... Thank you ___________________________________ L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail: http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: