Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7233.945050513@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com> writes: > Either we should keep the current docs > or the release docs online - not both. I disagree, because they serve different audiences. The snapshot docs are very useful to developers, particularly those of us who don't have SGML tools installed but still want to know whether the docs we committed recently look right or not ;-). Meanwhile, current-release documents are clearly the right thing to provide for ordinary users. I think a reasonable choice would be to provide current-release docs as the most readily accessible set of docs on the website, and to put the snapshot docs somewhere less obvious where only developers would normally go (preferably, accessed off a page that is clearly about development sources). If I can't have both, I'd reluctantly say that the release docs are the right ones to have on the website. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: