Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> A completely different approach would be to treat any failure on all
> platforms as non-fatal. We shouldn't really cut the checkpoint short if
> recycling a WAL file fails, whatever the reason. That seems like a more
> robust approach than trying to guess which error codes are OK to ignore.
I could live with that, as long as it gets logged.
regards, tom lane