Re: Bring atomic flag fallback up to snuff
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bring atomic flag fallback up to snuff |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7223.1523124425@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Bring atomic flag fallback up to snuff (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bring atomic flag fallback up to snuff
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > As Daniel pointed out in: > https://postgr.es/m/FB948276-7B32-4B77-83E6-D00167F8EEB4@yesql.se the > pg_atomic_flag fallback implementation is broken. That has gone > unnoticed because the fallback implementation wasn't testable until now: > ... > The attached fixes the bug and removes the edge-cases by storing a value > separate from the semaphore. I should have done that from the start. > This is an ABI break, but given the fallback didn't work at all, I don't > think that's a problem for backporting. > Fix attached. Comments? pademelon says it's wrong. 2018-04-07 13:39:34.982 EDT [1197:89] pg_regress/lock LOG: statement: SELECT test_atomic_ops(); TRAP: UnalignedPointer("(((uintptr_t) ((uintptr_t)(ptr)) + ((sizeof(*ptr)) - 1)) & ~((uintptr_t) ((sizeof(*ptr)) - 1))) !=(uintptr_t)(ptr)", File: "../../../src/include/port/atomics.h", Line: 177) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: