Re: R: feature proposal ...
От | Hans-Juergen Schoenig |
---|---|
Тема | Re: R: feature proposal ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 72006932-B433-48DE-85E0-9B0FF3C12CA5@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: R: feature proposal ... ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: R: feature proposal ...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
absolutely - the main advantage of the syntax tweak is that you can add parameters more easily. best regards, hans On 22 Sep 2005, at 21:25, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 11:31:42AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at> >> writes: >> >>> Paolo Magnoli wrote: >>> >>>> Can't you just use a view? >>>> >> >> >>> no because a new is not a heap ... >>> >> >> I think Paolo's idea is much better than munging the syntax of COPY, >> though. Fixing COPY so that you *could* copy from a view would >> provide >> all the desired functionality without any syntactic warts. >> > > While I'm all for COPY from views, I think I'd rather have the > syntactic > warts than code warts. ISTM that > > CREATE TEMP VIEW some_name AS SELECT * FROM table WHERE ...; > COPY some_name TO stdout; > > is much uglier than > > COPY SELECT * FROM table WHERE ... TO stdout; > -- > Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com > Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 > vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: