Re: Question about gettext licensing
От | Vikram Patil |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question about gettext licensing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 71F491F5DA99604A80DE49424BF3D02B0C660A5E@exchange8.actuate.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Question about gettext licensing (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Hey Peter, I forgot to mention that I am trying to build on windows. So I am not using libreadline. Thanks for your valuable help. Thanks & Regards, Vikram -----Original Message----- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 12:57 AM To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Cc: Vikram Patil Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Question about gettext licensing On Tuesday 04 August 2009 01:35:36 Vikram Patil wrote: > I was concerned about gettext licensing. I was able to build > PostgreSql with gettext library. But this project is distributed under > GNU license. > > So I would like to know if we want to distribute product commercially > under different licenses, will it be okay ? If not then what approach > usually companies, which distribute PostgreSql as database, follow? The gettext package contains the processing tools, but the run-time support is in your C library. So this is not different from compiling with GCC while the run-time support is again in the C library.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: