Re: feature request ?
От | Gregory S. Williamson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: feature request ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 71E37EF6B7DCC1499CEA0316A256832801057B7C@loki.wc.globexplorer.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | feature request ? (sad <sad@bankir.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: feature request ?
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
Programming languages, perhaps, but clearly not uncommon in SQL ... Informix certainly allows a column to be of type booleanbut with a value of NULL for given rows (unless precluded by a not-null constraint). Should we question integers,which can be positive, negative, or -- gasp ! -- NULL ? I don't see what your point is. That SQL is wrong ? Or that SQL is not "C" ? Or that SQL is not a "programming language"? "?Que purposa sirve tanto comedia ? Quien inventan tab miseria ?" Greg Williamson DBA GLobeXplorer LLC -----Original Message----- From: sad [mailto:sad@bankir.ru] Sent: Wed 6/23/2004 10:01 PM To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Cc: Subject: Re: [SQL] feature request ? On Wednesday 23 June 2004 21:12, you wrote: > Sad, > > > since BOOL expression has three possible values: TRUE,FALSE,NULL > > plpgsql IF control structure should have three alternate blocks: > > THEN,ELSE,NULL > > > > shouldn't it ? > > No, why? > > How would you construct a tri-valued IF/THEN? Doesn't seem too likely > to me, as well as being different from every other programming language in > existance ... Three valued BOOLEAN is already different "from every other programming language in existance" ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: