Re: Large table search question
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Large table search question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7188.1085979180@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Large table search question ("John Wells" <jb@sourceillustrated.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
"John Wells" <jb@sourceillustrated.com> writes: > A common lookup the application will require is the full name, so prefix + > first_name + middle_name + last_name. > My friend's suggestion was to create a "lookup field" in the table itself, > which would contain a concatenation of these fields created during insert. > So, for each record, we'd having each individual field and then a > full_name field that would contain the combination of the ind. fields. > His argument is that this will make lookups in this manner extremely fast > and efficient. Not unless you then add an index on that field, which would imply doubly redundant storage of the data (primary fields, lookup field, lookup field's index). You don't actually need the lookup field in Postgres: you can create the computed index directly. For instance create index fooi on foo ((first_name || middle_name || last_name)); select * from foo where (first_name || middle_name || last_name) = 'JohnQPublic'; This is still kinda grim on storage space, but at least it's 2x not 3x. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: