Re: Simpler dump?
От | Ted Byers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Simpler dump? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 718664.66964.qm@web88308.mail.re4.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Simpler dump? ("Uwe C. Schroeder" <uwe@oss4u.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Simpler dump?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Thanks Uwe This is a great start. It reduces the dump from 2 MB down to 167K, but out of 6833 lines of SQL, 5744 relate to the public schema in the DB, and I didn't touch that. It has over a dozen types, 419 functions, &c., that were put there by postgresql the moment I created the database. I'd expect the same stuff to be there the moment I issue the create database directive on the host machine, so all I really want is the dozen sequences, two dozen tables, and the suite of constraints I created, all in the schema specific to my new DB. Is there a reason pg_dump dumps the stuff in public even though that stuff seems to be created, and therefore present, in every database I create on a given server instance? Isn't that duplication a waste of space, and it's presence in the dump a waste of CPU cycles? Thanks again. Ted --- "Uwe C. Schroeder" <uwe@oss4u.com> wrote: > > pg_dump -x -O -s [databasename] > outfile.sql > > HTH > Uwe
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: