Re: Fix bug in handling of dropped columns in pltcl triggers
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fix bug in handling of dropped columns in pltcl triggers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 718405a6-00df-fdd3-6f3c-ba7db120fffb@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fix bug in handling of dropped columns in pltcl triggers (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fix bug in handling of dropped columns in pltcl triggers
Re: Fix bug in handling of dropped columns in pltcl triggers |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/4/16 4:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > My proposal therefore is for SPI_fnumber to ignore (not match to) > dropped columns, and to remove any caller-side attisdropped tests that > thereby become redundant. Yeah, SPI users certainly shouldn't need to worry about attisdropped, and exposing attnum doesn't seem like a good idea either. > It's possible that it'd make sense for pltcl_trigger_handler to ignore > empty-string column names in the returned list, so that the behavior > with stupid trigger functions would be a bit more forgiving; but that > is more or less independent of this patch. I'm a bit reluctant to do that since it'd be nice to be consistent with regular pltcl functions returning composites. The same kind of issue exists with the holes in $TG_relatts; we shouldn't be exposing the details of attnum that way. Any code that's expecting those holes is going to blow up after a dump/restore anyway. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: