Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 71813699-2992-fbde-1787-27f216f1ef35@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-11-24 13:32, Magnus Hagander wrote: > I think it boils down to that today the output from initdb is entirely > geared towards people running initdb directly and starting their > server manually, and very few people outside the actual PostgreSQL > developers ever do that. But there are still a lot of people who run > initdb through their wrapper manually (for redhat you have to do that, > for debian you only have to do it if you're creating a secondary > cluster but that still a pretty common operation). Perhaps it's worth asking whom the advice applies to then. You suggest it's mostly developers. I for one am still grumpy that in 9.5 we removed the variant of the hint that suggested "postgres -D ..." instead of pg_ctl. I used to copy and paste that a lot. The argument back then was that the hint should target end users, not developers. I doubt that under the current circumstances, running pg_ctl start from the console is really appropriate advice for a majority of users. (For one thing, systemd will kill it when you log out.) I don't know what better advice would be, though. Maybe we need to add some kind of text adventure game into initdb. -- Peter Eisentraut 2ndQuadrant, an EDB company https://www.2ndquadrant.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: