Re: Big 7.1 open items
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7181.961167635@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Big 7.1 open items (JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck)) |
Ответы |
Re: Big 7.1 open items
RE: Big 7.1 open items Re: Big 7.1 open items |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck) writes: > There are also disadvantages. > You can run out of space even if there are plenty GB's > free on your disks. You have to create tablespaces > explicitly. Not to mention the reverse: if I read this right, you have to suck up your GB's long in advance of actually needing them. That's OK for a machine that's dedicated to Oracle ... not so OK for smaller installations, playpens, etc. I'm not convinced that there's anything fundamentally wrong with doing storage allocation in Unix files the way we have been. (At least not when we're sitting atop a well-done filesystem, which may leave the Linux folk out in the cold ;-).) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: