Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7175.1232037557@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > The basic goal of the patch was to make 'S' consistent for all \d > backslash commands, and we had a lot of discussion about it, and many > people asked for it (I can't find my user functions). I think this falls in the category of "be careful what you wish for, you might get it". It is now blindingly obvious that the folks asking for that had not actually lived with the behavior for any period of time. Personally I think we should just revert the patch and go back to the behavior we've had for umpteen years. However, if you cannot bear to leave well enough alone, how about *reversing* the sense --- that is, default behavior is to show everything and there is an extra character to omit system objects? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: