Re: stats_block_level
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: stats_block_level |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7173.1185510655@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: stats_block_level (Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus@nttdata.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus@nttdata.co.jp> writes: > I think the stats stuff should be on by default even if it causes > some performance penalty. > Because when we have performance problems on the production system, > it needs more performance penalty (about 5%~) to measure the stats > by turning their params on. > In real scenario, we always need the performance information, > so we always need to turn. So I want the performance information > can be taken by default. I don't really agree with this argument. I've been reading pgsql-performance for some years now, and I can't recall any incident whatsoever in which we asked somebody for their stats_block_level numbers. To be honest I think those numbers are just about useless. However, in the current state of the system it seems to be nearly free to collect them if we are collecting row-level stats, and since that's happening by default as of 8.3, it's probably worth simplifying the user-visible behavior by collecting both sets of stats if we collect either. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: