Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output vs make installcheck
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output vs make installcheck |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 71576b32-f9bc-fdbd-782f-af5f0dc9f84c@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] bytea_output vs make installcheck (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output vs make installcheck
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/14/17 16:50, Jeff Janes wrote: > make installcheck currently fails against a server running > with bytea_output = escape. > > Making it succeed is fairly easy, and I think it is worth doing. > > Attached are two options for doing that. One overrides bytea_output > locally where-ever needed, and the other overrides it for the entire > 'regression' database. I would use option 2 here (ALTER DATABASE) and be done with it. Some people didn't like using ALTER DATABASE, but it's consistent with existing use. If someone wants to change that, that can be independent of this issue. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: