RE: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Mount
Тема RE: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes
Дата
Msg-id 714F8949628ED1119E0F0060082C52F50951D5@vesta.maidstone.gov.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-interfaces
I have had a report from someone using Servlets, that they are opening
something like 5 to 10 connections from a single Java Servlet, which then
brokers them to clients.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pgsql-interfaces@hub.org
[mailto:owner-pgsql-interfaces@hub.org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 1998 3:28 PM
To: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org; pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE
protocol changes

In the current system architecture, much the easiest way to execute
concurrent queries is to open up more than one connection.  There's
nothing that says a frontend process can't fire up multiple backend
processes.  I think this is probably sufficient, because I don't
foresee such a thing becoming really popular anyway.


В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes