Re: Running a Simple Update Statement Fails, Second Time Suceeds.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Running a Simple Update Statement Fails, Second Time Suceeds. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7112.1567546872@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Running a Simple Update Statement Fails, Second Time Suceeds. (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Running a Simple Update Statement Fails, Second Time Suceeds.
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> writes: > On 9/3/19 1:56 PM, Kumar, Virendra wrote: >> Here is simple query, I am running via function call. This statement >> runs fine as SQL but when put in function as plpgsql it failes with >> error below, when I ran second times in same session it succeeds: > We will need to see the function definition. Also, what PG version is that? This looks a bit like bug #15913, but it might be something else. >> This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain >> information that is PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. >> >> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any >> dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message >> and its attachments and notify the sender immediately. Thank you. I rather wonder whether I'm even allowed to read this, let alone answer it. You do realize that this sort of add-on is completely silly on a public mailing list? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: