Re: Use pread and pwrite instead of lseek + write and read
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Use pread and pwrite instead of lseek + write and read |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7109.1471441241@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Use pread and pwrite instead of lseek + write and read (Oskari Saarenmaa <os@ohmu.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: Use pread and pwrite instead of lseek + write and read
Re: Use pread and pwrite instead of lseek + write and read Re: Use pread and pwrite instead of lseek + write and read |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Oskari Saarenmaa <os@ohmu.fi> writes: > On my laptop a simple pgbench run (scale 100, 15 minutes) shows a 1.5% > performance improvement. I would have hoped for a lot better result before anyone would propose that we should deal with all the portability issues this'll create. > A 1.5% performance improvement is small but > measurable - and IMV more importantly it allows us to drop more than 100 > lines of backwards (compatible?) code; maybe we could start targeting > more recent platforms in v10? That's basically nonsense: we'll end up adding way more than that to deal with platforms that haven't got these APIs. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: