Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Inserts and bad performance
От | Gavin Flower |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Inserts and bad performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 70e9efe6-c771-eeb3-6c03-35911e7052e5@archidevsys.co.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Inserts and bad performance ("Godfrin, Philippe E" <Philippe.Godfrin@nov.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 28/11/21 17:17, Godfrin, Philippe E wrote: > > Right you are sir! I figured that out a few hours ago! > > pg > > *From:* Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 24, 2021 10:58 PM > *To:* pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: Inserts and bad performance > > On 11/24/21 1:15 PM, Godfrin, Philippe E wrote: > > [snip] > > I dropped the unique index , rebuilt the other indexes and no change. > > > IMNSHO, this is the worst possible approach. Drop everything *except* > the unique index, and then (if possible) sort the input file by the > unique key. That'll increase buffered IO; otherwise, you're bopping > all around the filesystem. > > Using a bulk loader if possible would increase speeds > > -- > Angular momentum makes the world go 'round. > Please don't top post! Cheers, Gavin
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: